FOR all the debate about it, Britain's shale-gas industry is minuscule. Whereas roughnecks inAmerica have sunk many thousands of wells since a boom began more than a decade ago,Britain has fracked at only one test site, in Lancashire, and not since 2011. In a reportpublished on May 8th, an all-party group from the House of Lords said that speeding shale-gasexploration should be an “urgent national priority”. So far, so familiar—and entirely in tunewith the position of the coalition government. But the authors go on to blame the government,not green campaigners, for holding the frackers up.
The Lords' economic-affairs committee argues that shale gas could boost Britain's economywhile reducing its dependence on imports. It says that proper oversight can limit theenvironmental and health risks associated with fracking. And it recognises that burning moregas instead of coal—which is still used to generate more than one-third of Britain's electricity—could be a cheap and sustainable way to lower the country's carbon emissions while waitingfor pricey renewable technologies to mature.
But a thicket of regulation has slowed progress to a crawl. Although dozens of test wells areneeded even to calculate the extent of Britain's shale-gas reserves, Cuadrilla, an oil and gasfirm, reckons it could take more than a year to get clearance for each site. Part of the problem isthat several government agencies share responsibility for approving fracking applications. TheLords worry that unwieldy rules will not make the business much safer but could prod shale-gas firms into seeking far richer pickings abroad.
Complaints about bureaucracy are embarrassing to a government that has promised to go “allout for shale”, and which is busily finding ways to stop critics beyond Westminster from holdingup the industry. It has persuaded shale-gas firms to put £100,000 ($170,000) into a fund forlocal causes each time they drill a test site. In January it promised to let local councils keep allthe money frackers pay in business rates, up from half at present. Next month it will probablyannounce plans to make it easier for fracking firms to drill tunnels deep beneath people'shomes.
Pushing through that proposal will mean fending off noisy opposition from environmentallobbies such as Greenpeace, which had hoped its supporters could use Britain's aged trespasslaws to make life difficult for shale-gas boosters. Such campaigns carry weight while mostBritons are still making up their minds about the industry. The proportion in favour of frackinghas shrunk since lively protests erupted at a drill site near Balcombe in Sussex last summer; itmay keep sliding until a few pioneers prove it can be safe and unobtrusive. All the more reasonto get cracking.